Parliament will have ‘full and substantive’ debate on Parti Liyani case, even though Sylvia Lim’s motion not selected: Tan Chuan-Jin
Today·2020-09-30 12:00
SINGAPORE — The high-profile court case involving the former domestic helper of Changi Airport Group’s ex-chairman Liew Mun Leong will be fully debated in Parliament even though a proposed adjournment motion on the issue has not been picked for the next parliamentary session, Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin said.
……Singapore Government Politics parliament
Comments
Leave a comment in Nestia App
hotpot 01/10/2020
Mr. Tan only u know, anything pro PAP u go ahead. Its only natural, why gives excuses. Just. Say that all party members in Parliament hv to abide by the whip. Just take note, spore is a tiny dot n r governed by the pap for 55years, n all of u 4 g ministers n MPs after the death of our late LKY, u all hv been driving downhill with all the absurd policies n I m sure some of u r in disagreement but hv to squeeze ur balls n keep quiet n as long as u hv ur pay check in. Let me put it all of u r only going for the high salary n not interested in politics. Ask urself how capable r u to hold such positions. Pls hv some conscience.
Reply
Usergo0g 01/10/2020
There’s no need for the jobs the mayors are undertaking. Even if CDCs required leaders, lots of singaporean talents could fulfil the jobs, why need to put MPs??? Singapore no talents??? LHL, you’re making more and more singaporean unhappiness and disgusted by the way you run the country.
Reply
Usergo0g reply atomic 02/10/2020
PAP using the fear factor during this pandemic and called for GE 2020, and thought could win by landslide. But 39% of us denied him. 39% of us is able to retain Aljunied where PAP thought was a sire win! 39% of us I s able to make Hougang with a clear win! 39% of us is able to boot PAP’s 3 senior office holders out from Shengkang. 39% of us was able to make West Coast votes declined by 26% and allowed heavy weight DMP in East Coast to win only by 3%, and this GE 2020 is a referendum of the failure of PAP government. So you can sit back and watch 39% of us denied and worsen the power hold of PAP in next GE. 39% of us clearly understand the impact of People’s Power. By then, you may shed tears like JT and may also consider migrating.
Reply
Usergo0g reply atomic 02/10/2020
Please please don’t make yourself a laughing stalk in the public. Go and read today’s newspaper on the survey and data on the support rate of PAP..... The percentage of people like you who conservatively and blindly supporting PAP is declining, and percentage is increase for people like us who distrust the current PAP. At the same time, report even suggested that PAP losing another GRC is not impossible in the next GE. Hence prepare yourself for the inevitable fall of PAP in the near future, and you may well prepared for migration.
Reply
MCB2 reply Usergo0g 04/10/2020
Agreed, there are still places we can voice out, organise a protest march from Hong Lim park to the Yistana..anyone?
Reply
Usere2e5 01/10/2020
Second hand smoke versus JUSTICE, third world country can do better
Reply
King Fish 01/10/2020
Prosecutors did not go deeper into the investigation because the people who made the complaint was a high profile person with connections to the PAP. The prosecutors were afraid of this and just went ahead to charge a nobody but they forgot that all foreigners if committed a crime, their embassy will be informed and will look into the case to see a fair court judgement will be served.
Reply
One-stop lifestyle app dedicated to making life in Singapore a breeze!
Alicia Tan3288 05/10/2020
please don't waste taxpayers' money debating the obvious, address the grievances of the falsely accused victim! The law already spells out the infringements you don't have to debate in parliament about it! Don't waste taxpayers'money on one foreigner when the law already can already protect her right! Please debate a more important issue that affect the entire country, CPF lump-sum payment at 55!
Reply