Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai has addressed concerns about AI potentially causing job losses at the company.

In an interview in San Francisco, Pichai said that AI serves as a tool to enhance productivity rather than replace employees.

He explained that AI helps engineers concentrate on meaningful tasks by automating repetitive work.

Pichai described AI as a means to drive product innovation and create demand for new employees, while confirming Alphabet’s plans for continued growth into 2026.

.source-ref{font-size:0.85em;color:#666;display:block;margin-top:1em;}a.ask-tia-citation-link:hover{color:#11628d !important;background:#e9f6f5 !important;border-color:#11628d !important;text-decoration:none !important;}@media only screen and (min-width:768px){a.ask-tia-citation-link{font-size:11px !important;}}

🔗 Source: TechCrunch

🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ The entry-level job paradox: AI’s uneven impact across employment tiers

Pichai’s optimism contrasts with emerging evidence suggesting AI’s impact on jobs may be uneven across different career stages.

Research shows that entry-level and routine positions are disproportionately vulnerable to AI disruption, with tech companies reducing hiring of recent graduates by 25% in 2024 compared to 2023 1.

Meanwhile, hiring for professionals with 2-5 years of experience increased by 27%, revealing a troubling paradox where AI simultaneously creates demand for experienced talent while potentially eliminating traditional entry points into industries 1.

This trend extends beyond tech, with a World Economic Forum survey indicating 40% of employers plan workforce reductions in roles where AI can automate tasks, particularly affecting early-career opportunities 2.

The implications are significant: if entry-level positions continue diminishing while companies prioritize experienced hires, questions arise about how the next generation will gain the experience necessary to qualify for the jobs AI hasn’t eliminated.

2️⃣ Perception gap: The stark divide between expert and public AI outlook

Pichai’s acknowledgment of job displacement fears reflects a documented perception gap between AI experts and the general public.

Pew Research found that 56% of AI experts believe artificial intelligence will positively impact the U.S. over the next two decades, while only 17% of the general public shares this optimism 3.

Conversely, 35% of the general public expects AI to negatively affect society, compared to just 15% of experts—highlighting a significant disconnect in how these technologies are perceived 3.

This divergence extends to employment concerns, with 64% of the public fearing job losses compared to a much smaller percentage of experts 3.

The gap suggests that technology leaders face a substantial challenge not just in developing AI responsibly, but in building public trust and addressing widespread concerns about technological displacement.

3️⃣ AGI predictions: A landscape of uncertainty despite bold claims

Pichai’s hesitancy about the path to artificial general intelligence (AGI) aligns with broader expert disagreement, despite frequent bold predictions from tech executives.

Analysis of over 8,590 expert predictions reveals varying timelines, with estimates for a 50% probability of achieving AGI ranging between 2040 and 2061, though some researchers suggest it could happen as early as 2028 4.

A substantial majority of AI researchers believe current methods are inadequate for achieving AGI in the near term, with over 75% indicating that technological breakthroughs beyond existing approaches will be necessary 5.

This uncertainty contrasts with marketing-driven narratives from some tech companies suggesting AGI is imminent, creating potentially unrealistic expectations among investors and the public 6.

The variance in predictions reflects the genuine technical uncertainty surrounding AGI development, suggesting caution when interpreting ambitious timeline claims from industry leaders.

Recent Alphabet developments

……