Job offer letter different than what was presented during interview. Thoughts? 

Hi all. As the above says I had a job interview where when I asked about the compensation the human resource manager said that “it would be in the $96,000 a year”

The offer letter states that it would be $48,000 until I show proficiency in the software they use/job requirements. They said “We expect this to take six months”

This would be my first engineering job, but I can’t help but think that I’m getting the short end here.

What should I do? Should I sign the offer letter or continue my job search? This is going to be my first full time job and I’m afraid that I will get worse offers or can’t even find one in the coming months.

The repayment of my school loan will begin soon.

Here are what netizens think:

I’m willing to bet you’re not getting a 50+% raise in 6 months.

Alot of employers use dirty tricks to cheat their employees as everything that is said from the mouth cannot be presented in court unless you have a recording of the verbal contract and a witness who will side with you. But I doubt the companie’s HR will be a witness against their own company.

Yep. Require something in writing about how proficiency is demonstrated, and salary after the fact. Otherwise, it is meaningless.

My very first job did something similar to me. I was looking for a full-time salaried position, they claimed they were hoping for an hourly intern during the interview, but offered the 6 month trial before pay bump. Everything was in writing. 6 months later, “We can’t afford to do this” and “We meant when you have your P.E. and could head projects.”