OKC Thunder, Indiana Pacers race for edge in Game 3 of NBA Finals

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander of the Oklahoma City Thunder attempts a shot against against the Indiana Pacers during Game 2. Getty Images via AFP

UPDATED Jun 11, 2025, 12:01 PM

Thanks for sharing!

INDIANAPOLIS – Nothing is settled in the NBA Finals through two games, with the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder trading wins as the best-of-seven series shifts to Indianapolis for Game 3 on June 11 (June 12, Singapore time).

“Now the goal is to get to three games,” Thunder guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander said.

“It’s first team to three. Kind of like it’s a blank slate, a scratch – 1-1, 0-0, and it’s first to three.”

Gilgeous-Alexander drove the Thunder to victory in Game 2 after Tyrese Haliburton’s heart-stopping floater ended Game 1, his fourth game-winner of these play-offs.

The MVP has 72 points through two games, the most ever in the first two games of a Finals debut.

Haliburton limped through parts of the Game 2 loss, with Oklahoma City pressuring him with multiple defenders and trying to force the ball to Pascal Siakam or Indiana’s other offensive players.

Haliburton said on June 10 he does have a “lower body thing” impacting him but plans to be on the floor when Indiana hosts an NBA Finals game for the first time since losing to the Los Angeles Lakers in 2000.

Pacers coach Rick Carlisle, going for his second NBA title as a head coach, has constantly reminded his young team not to unpack any of the good, bad or ugly from the first two games of the series as they embrace the home-floor opportunity.

“Everything that’s already happened doesn’t matter, other than the score of the series,” Carlisle said. “We have to move forward.”

The Pacers are looking for a boost from being at home and answers for slowing down Gilgeous-Alexander, who grasps the notion he might see a new mix of defensive looks from Indiana with two off days since Oklahoma City claimed a 123-107 win on June 8.

“A series is so tricky. It definitely is a feeling-out,” Gilgeous-Alexander said.

“But there’s also so many adjustments made to where it’s almost hard to predict and try to determine what they’re going to do with you. You kind of just have to be ready for everything and just try to be as sharp as you can. That’s how I kind of see it.”

The Pacers overcame a 15-point deficit in the fourth quarter of Game 1 to steal one in Oklahoma City (111-110). Getting to the rim has been a tall order for Indiana. The Pacers have been outscored by 20 points in the paint. Resolve has been a major trait helping define the team’s success, and they’re 4-0 in the playoffs following a loss.

To take control of the Finals, Carlisle is stressing the importance of tamping down turnovers without losing contact with the accelerator. Haliburton tied his playoff high with five in Game 2 and entered the fourth quarter with just five points.

“You try to address those things as best as we can. Tyrese has been historically great with ball security,” Carlisle said.

“This team that we’re playing now presents unprecedented challenges because they’ve been turning everybody over through the entire playoffs. We’re going to have to have really great spatial awareness.”

Oklahoma City’s defensive approach is likely to be similar until the Pacers prove they can handle the on-ball energy. How Thunder head coach Mark Daigneault executes his plan is quite literally anyone’s guess.

He used more than 700 lineup combinations during the regular season, more than any team in the league, and found unique groups to gain an edge on the boards in Game 2.

“We have a group of guys that are just ready to play,” Thunder guard Jalen Williams said.

“We have so many different lineups throughout the course of the year that nobody is shocked by when Mark wants to go small, change this around or do that.”

Daigneault doesn’t take credit for throwing a changeup or two and isn’t worried about being predictable. The only advantage he wants the Thunder to have at the end of the game is more possessions than the opponent.

“The general battle we’re trying to win is the possession battle. There’s different ways to do that,” he said.

“In the first game, we were able to win it with turnovers, which tends to be the way we can win it when we’re smaller. In the second game, we obviously rebounded better in those units, which is an advantage when we’re bigger.

“We have optionality. Every game is different.” REUTERS

Join  ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Thanks for sharing!