Amazon has begun rolling out Alexa+, a new version of its voice assistant powered by generative AI.

It’s designed to handle more complex tasks like summarizing schedules, managing emails, remembering user information, and processing documents.

The assistant integrates with services like OpenTable, Ticketmaster, and Uber, and can access user accounts for features like calendar management.

Initial testing found the setup more streamlined with QR code onboarding and better control over data sharing.

However, the Alexa app’s interface remains cluttered, and features like default audiobook selection and voice chat history were hard to locate.

Alexa+ could answer calendar queries and follow up on previous requests, but sometimes interrupted or lagged. Efforts to store info or extract data from emails had mixed results.

Alexa+ is still in beta and continues to face issues with accuracy and completeness.

.source-ref{font-size:0.85em;color:#666;display:block;margin-top:1em;}a.ask-tia-citation-link:hover{color:#11628d !important;background:#e9f6f5 !important;border-color:#11628d !important;text-decoration:none !important;}@media only screen and (min-width:768px){a.ask-tia-citation-link{font-size:11px !important;}}

🔗 Source: TechCrunch

🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ Voice assistant development shows persistent gap between ambitious promises and practical execution

The struggles with Alexa+ mirror a decades-long pattern in voice assistant development where breakthrough announcements consistently outpace real-world performance.

Voice recognition technology has been “almost ready” for consumer use since IBM’s Shoebox could recognize 16 words in 1962, yet even today’s AI-powered systems face basic execution issues like the calendar interruptions and memory failures described in the article1.

This pattern extends back through Dragon NaturallySpeaking in 1997, which promised natural speech recognition but required significant user adaptation. The current Alexa+ beta issues—failing to remember frequent flier numbers correctly, missing important dates in emails, and providing incorrect self-help instructions—echo these historical challenges where promising demos don’t translate to reliable daily use.

Even after decades of development, voice assistants still struggle with the fundamental challenge of consistently understanding context and executing tasks accurately2.

2️⃣ Amazon doubles down on AI to address its core competitive weakness in search accuracy

Amazon’s aggressive push into generative AI with Alexa+ reflects the company’s need to close a significant performance gap with Google Assistant in information retrieval.

Recent testing shows Google Assistant correctly answers 93% of questions compared to Alexa’s 80%, a substantial disadvantage that becomes more problematic as users expect ChatGPT-level intelligence from their voice assistants3.

However, Amazon maintains a crucial advantage in smart home integration, supporting over 140,000 devices compared to competitors—a lead that explains why the company is betting on AI-powered features rather than abandoning the platform3.

The integration of multiple AI models from companies like Anthropic demonstrates Amazon’s recognition that its own AI capabilities lag behind specialized providers, requiring a model-agnostic approach to remain competitive.

This strategic shift represents Amazon’s attempt to leverage its smart home dominance while addressing its search and reasoning weaknesses, though early results suggest the execution challenges remain significant.

Recent Amazon developments

……